Barfly

Bukowski - Born Into This Documents the life of reclusive writer Charles Bukowski.Genre: DocumentaryRating: RRelease Date: 21-MAR-2006Media Type: DVD	Factotum Henry chinaski considers himself a writer & on occassion writes. Mostly he quests for booze & women that sidetrack rather than inspire greatness. When he falls for jan the soulful connection fails to save either from their self-destructive ways & the relationship totters between ...	The Charles Bukowski Tapes When Barbet Schroeder (More General Idi Amin Dada Single White Female) began work on the movie Barfly he had no idea that it would be such a struggle. During the seven years it took him to complete the film he turned his cameras on its screenwriter poet and novelist Charles Bukow...	Ham on Rye: A Novel In what is widely hailed as the best of his many novels, Charles Bukowski details the long, lonely years of his own hardscrabble youth in the raw voice of alter ego Henry Chinaski. From a harrowingly cheerless childhood in Germany through acne-riddled high school years and his a...	Women: A Novel Low-life writer and unrepentant alcoholic Henry Chinaski was born to survive. After decades of slacking off at low-paying dead-end jobs, blowing his cash on booze and women, and scrimping by in flea-bitten apartments, Chinaski sees his poetic star rising at last. Now, at fifty, ...
Hollywood Hank and his wife, Sarah, agree to write a screenplay, and encounter the strange world of the movie industry.	Notes of a Dirty Old Man "People come to my door-too many of them really-and knock to tell me Notes of a Dirty Old Man turns them on. A bum off the road brings in a gypsy and his wife and we talk. . . drink half the night. A long distance operator from Newburgh, N.Y. sends me money. She wants me to give...	post office: A Novel "It began as a mistake." By middle age, Henry Chinaski has lost more than twelve years of his life to the U.S. Postal Service. In a world where his three true, bitter pleasures are women, booze, and racetrack betting, he somehow drags his hangover out of bed every dawn to lug wa...	Factotum One of Charles Bukowski's best, this beer-soaked, deliciously degenerate novel follows the wanderings of aspiring writer Henry Chinaski across World War II-era America. Deferred from military service, Chinaski travels from city to city, moving listlessly from one odd job to anot...	Angel Heart (Special Edition) Harry angel is a tough new york detective pitted against the most fearsome adversary possible. It is a provocative and chilling story entwined in the world of the occult set in backwoods new orleans. Studio: Lions Gate Home Ent. Release Date: 02/06/2007 Starring: Lisa Bonet Mi...

WHY IS THIS FILM OOP? DVD RELEASE NEEDED IN THE U.S.!
It's been a while since I last saw this film and I remember liking it a lot! The DVD has gone out of print(OOP) and it's a shame that so many people will miss seeing this interesting and gritty film. Rourke gives a memorable perfomance in this tale of booze and should-a", "would-a","could a's". I would have to see it again before I could give it an honest rating, but it is certainly worth a new DVD release. "I could have beaten him if I had eaten a sandwich!" Please re-release this film on DVD!

I Love This Film and Watch It Over and Again -- A CLASSIC
This is an excellent film. Nonconformists and those who like to look at things differently than the "regular consensus" might appreciate this film the most. Yet it is not strange or uncommon. It is brilliantly honest and truthful in a way few films are. It is (somewhat) based on a portion of the life of Charles Bukowski who wrote the screenplay and claimed not to feel the film portrayed what he was really like. It actually probably flattered him a bit much, as Rourke was incredibly attractive somehow in this role. Cinematic magic indeed. Faye Dunaway was also par excellence in her role as an over-the-hill female drunk barfly. However this movie is WAY too expensive no matter how good it is. Therefore it really needs to be re-released. With the release of the DVD of this film in 2002 the company that released it make way too few copies. They did not realize what a TRUE CLASSIC they have on their hands. They need to realize this and re-release it so that the common folk can afford to buy a copy too. You can sign an online petition to this effect by Googling "barfly dvd petition." That will take you there. Please do sign it. I did! By the way, I did not list all the reasons I love this movie. Kind of running short on time but believe me I could go on and on for QUITE a while about all the reasons I LOVE this film. ESPECIALLY for the "thinking wo/man."

Bukowski's Only Screenplay is a Masterpiece
Anyway who criticizes Mickey Rourke's performance in BARFLY has never really been really drunk. Even if Bukowski himself never wanted Mickey Rourke to play the role, it doesn't mean much. Bukowski would of hated anyone who played the role of his alter ego Hank Chinaski. I don't think he would of cared much for Matt Dillon in that role either. The Charles Bukowski novel "Hollywood" chronicles the disastrous making-of this film as well as the haphazard screen writing assignment of BARFLY. The novel Hollywood is indeed as another reviewer described a must read after or prior to watching the film. Not to spoil the book "Hollywood" but in the end even Bukowski comes around to Rourke. Describing him as the only Stand-up guy involved in the film at the end of the day. The film was produced by the same producer of DEATH WISH 4 which should give you an idea of what the director and cast had to deal with to make this film. BARFLY is a testament to the times when you realize that the real drunks and real writers who had populated the outskirts of the Hollywood landscape are all gone. Leaving us with only posers like Sean Penn who ride the coat tails of genuine artists like Charles Bukowski.

20 Years Later: Not nearly as good as I remember.
Barfly (Barbet Schroeder, 1987) When I was a young poet, like most people who became young poets in the seventies and eighties, one of my idols was Charles Bukowski. So when Barfly came out, I rushed to see it, and was awed. I've carried the nostalgia for it around for twenty years, and finally decided to see it again. Somewhat to my surprise, I found I'd been looking at it through rather rose-colored glasses all this time. Watching it now, the biggest problem with the movie is Mickey Rourke, whose hipster-wannabe portrayal of Bukowski's alter ego Henry Chinaski draws far more from Arthur Fonzarelli than the Beats (not that Bukowski ever identified with the Beats). When he's on his game, Rourke is a fantastic actor, but here he overacts the role to death, creating a thoroughly unbelievable character. While critics of the film during its original release were quick to point out that it mirrors Bukowski's writings ("depressing and pointless", my mother's favorite radio talk show host called it), and I took that at face value twenty years ago, I'm not so sure it's the case now. While the atmosphere is certainly close enough for jazz, and all the little quirks that make Bukowski's life filmable pop up, the major contradictions of which those quirks were symptomatic don't put in much of an appearance. People in the film address the central concept that Buk was, in fact, a whole lot smarter than everyone around him, but Rourke's portrayal never brings that to light. A lot of people ask why he chooses to live as a bum, but neither Rourke nor Schroeder is quick to offer an answer. To be fair, Buk might not have had one, but his writings and interviews from the period during which he wrote the screenplay would suggest otherwise. I think the film was meant as an answer, and it simply didn't come through. As usual where nostalgia is concerned, the product doesn't match the memory of the product. **

I fell in love with it...
Very few movies have that certain something that just makes them so endearing that a viewer can just keep coming back and watching the movie maybe 100 some odd times and never tire of it. For me, Barfly is one of those few. I was a big fan of Bukowski's writings long before I saw this movie, and while Bukowski himself may not have liked this film, I would remind those that agree with him that Bukowski didn't like any movies, so naturally he's going to be inclined to hate one that he wrote most of all. Don't listen to the drones that will tell you this movie is bad because it romanticises alcoholism... they're just pansies. Just as Bukowski said himself, "anything can be an art," I will say that romance can exist in anything as well.